
The Great Gatsby: The Original 1925 Edition (A F. Scott Fitzgerald Classic Novel)
F. Scott Fitzgerald
4.9 on Amazon
57 HN comments

The Brothers Karamazov
Fyodor Dostoevsky, Richard Pevear, et al.
4.7 on Amazon
33 HN comments

Anna Karenina
Leo Tolstoy , Richard Pevear, et al.
4.7 on Amazon
28 HN comments

Nightfall: Devil's Night #4
Penelope Douglas
4.7 on Amazon
20 HN comments

Fifty Shades of Grey: Book One of the Fifty Shades Trilogy
Becca Battoe, E. L. James, et al.
3.9 on Amazon
19 HN comments

Persuasion: A Jane Austen's Classic Novel (200th Anniversary Collection Edition)
Jane Austen
4.5 on Amazon
12 HN comments

The Scarlet Letter
Nathaniel Hawthorne
4.3 on Amazon
11 HN comments

The Witness
Nora Roberts, Julia Whelan, et al.
4.7 on Amazon
8 HN comments

Genome: The Extinction Files, Book 2
A. G. Riddle, Edoardo Ballerini, et al.
4.5 on Amazon
6 HN comments

Secrets and Lies
Selena Montgomery
4.5 on Amazon
6 HN comments

You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation
Deborah Tannen
4.3 on Amazon
6 HN comments

Complications: A Novel
Danielle Steel
? on Amazon
6 HN comments

Gone with the Wind
Margaret Mitchell, Linda Stephens, et al.
4.8 on Amazon
6 HN comments

Lone Wolf
Diana Palmer, Kate Pearce, et al.
4.5 on Amazon
5 HN comments

Ship of Theseus
J. J. Abrams and Doug Dorst
4.6 on Amazon
5 HN comments
sanxiynonJan 6, 2017
Tade0onJan 19, 2021
That's assuming people read the best books.
Let's not forget that Fifty Shades of Grey was the best selling book of the decade (in the US):
https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/20...
StevePerkinsonJune 18, 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gor
https://www.google.com/search?q=gor&biw=1920&bih=947&source=...
ZimahlonFeb 15, 2013
It has become only less taboo to talk about recently, coming to the mainstream in books like "Fifty Shades of Grey".
globular-toastonFeb 17, 2021
josteinkonSep 19, 2012
His writing serves little purpose sans as a base for analysis of how the Apple RDF affects basic reasoning.
silverorioleonApr 13, 2019
I also don’t agree with his sexual-marketplace ideas about how women choose mates, and why it’s a good thing for women to choose men who behave badly towards them because they’ll change: “[female lobsters] identify the top guy quickly, and become irresistibly attracted to him. This is brilliant strategy, in my estimation. It’s also one used by females of many different species, including humans. ... His aggression has made him successful, so he’s likely to react [to the female] in a dominant, irritable manner. Furthermore, he’s large, healthy and powerful. It’s no easy task to switch his attention from fighting to mating. (If properly charmed, however, he will change his behaviour towards the female. This is the lobster equivalent of Fifty Shades of Grey, the fastest-selling paperback of all time, and the eternal Beauty-and-the-Beast plot of archetypal romance. This is the pattern of behaviour continually represented in the sexually explicit literary fantasies that are as popular among women as provocative images of naked women are among men.)” Is this good advice or information for men or women? Personally, I don’t think so, but since it bears absolutely no relation to how I chose my partner, I suppose Peterson would say I am some kind of outlier or unusual female. Readers may make their own minds up about the quote.
rdtsconApr 13, 2019
There is something strange about that book being so popular.
I think one can argue that women have been socialized to want aggressive men so that becomes a common fantasy vs it's a biologically based phenomenon. I wonder if there is a way to compare how popular the book is in relation to how strongly stereotypical the education and culture is.
defterGooseonMay 5, 2021
I think the answer here is that the expectations being thrown into the ring from all parties are unrealistic and self-serving, and the only true bastion of sanity is the one provided by raw biological drives. We as humans can continue attempting to put ourselves above our animal nature, but it does seem that we might be destined to fall on our face.
sytelusonDec 25, 2018
I wouldn't be surprised if Taleb has made more money from his books then his hedge fund career and accordingly he might be more aggressive to protect his image as dispenser of great counter-intuitive insights. His assertions in these sets of tweets are obviously overblown. IQ testing is known to be very faulty measure for intelligence but at the same time lot of rebellious personalities including Einstein, Bill Gates, Lady Gaga etc have had high (> 150) IQ. No one would call them people yearning to be obedient salaried drones.
keithwinsteinonJan 8, 2013
runevaultonJan 26, 2018
kafkaesqueonSep 25, 2015
I also majored in literature and philosophy and had to write essays a lot. I got a lot of As.
The first thing to learn is that every group of writers follows different rules.
Think about why you want to publish your writings. Learn that context matters -- that is, your target audience matters. People reading my blog posts don't want the same thing as the people reading my essays at university. My university essays have a different tone and style. To be sure, the essays on my blog are the least popular, because they are very academic. That's okay. I like to write that way sometimes.
Often the things that others find interesting in our writings are things the writer would have never guessed. Because of this, it's all right to swallow your pride and just hit "Publish." Some of it will be horrible, some of it will be great. And there is always the stuff in between.
From a strictly academic perspective, the easiest type of essay to write is a comparative essay. Compare books, ideas, or topics that are similar enough to warrant a comparison; e.g., sexual parallels in Fifty Shades of Grey and Marquis de Sade's literary oeuvre, if you're going for a wide appeal. I just made that up. It's all experimentation.
Another academic "lesson" is when you're stuck writing an essay, it's time to bring in another example.
These are standard techniques that possibly engender a style that is stale and stiff. The more you cater to your reader, the more entertaining it'll be, because you'll speak her or his vernacular.
Having said all that, I have only published my poetry in very small publications. Nobody is interested in my short stories or essays (outside of academia), and I am by no stretch of the imagination a blogger who others read assiduously.
I am read by a very small circle of writer friends.
We have a joke.
We're good at things that don't have much value in modern culture.
It's a big joke.
And we're the punch line.
sytelusonApr 23, 2015
However this generally doesn't apply to tech books because number of programmers are just around 10 million and if you estimate 1% will buy your book (best case) you will still top out $300K range @ 10% royalty. Even worse, technology will change in next 2-3 years and your royalties would dry up quickly. Most "full time" tech book writers run training consulting business and do conferences as main source of income.
exolymphonJan 26, 2018
jiggy2011onApr 6, 2013
This seems a little selective!
What about stuff like Tolkien, Pratchett , A song of fire and ice and countless other fantasy/sci-fi things?
Perhaps Women see reading as a more social experience , whereas for men it's more of an individual activity?
Amongst my female friends , it seems that if one of them has read a book then they have all read it. So perhaps that might explain why the bestseller lists will tend to favour books intended for women?
balabasteronJune 8, 2015
Day dreaming is a means of escaping your existing reality... but if you take no action, then your day dreaming is just that. You need to take action to give any possibility of it ever becoming more than that. In this case, the $5 for the ticket is that step. Perhaps the fantasy is what you live for. Perhaps you spend your life with your head buried in romance novels, who knows, the effect is the same - you paid $5 for the book which gave you a few good hours of day dreaming, or perhaps even a number of days of escape. The lottery ticket gave you a couple of hours escape before you come back to reality. It's just a pleasant way to pass the time. You can tell just how many people have this mindset by the number of copies of Fifty Shades of Grey you saw being read on public transit after it came out.
tomkuonMar 16, 2013
planetguyonJune 28, 2012
Y'know that book "Fifty Shades Of Grey"? Well that's what your comment's gonna go through in the next hour if you disagree with (I can't believe I'm saying this) the hivemind.
edit: Also, what's with this new "You're submitting too fast. Please slow down" message you get if people start downvoting your posts? I've had it swallow a bunch of (intelligent) posts this morning due to the fact that I expressed an unpopular opinion on a copyright thread.
That fucking does it.