
Watership Down
Richard Adams, Peter Capaldi, et al.
4.7 on Amazon
1 HN comments

Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art
Scott McCloud
4.7 on Amazon
1 HN comments

Saga: Compendium One
Brian K Vaughan and Fiona Staples
4.8 on Amazon
1 HN comments

The Way of Kings: The Stormlight Archive, Book 1
Brandon Sanderson, Kate Reading, et al.
4.8 on Amazon
1 HN comments

The Master and Margarita: 50th-Anniversary Edition (Penguin Classics Deluxe Edition)
Mikhail Bulgakov , Christopher Conn Askew, et al.
4.6 on Amazon
1 HN comments

That's Not What Happened
Kody Keplinger
4.6 on Amazon
1 HN comments

Girl, Serpent, Thorn
Melissa Bashardoust
4.4 on Amazon
1 HN comments

The Arrival
Shaun Tan
4.8 on Amazon
1 HN comments

Ender's Game: Special 20th Anniversary Edition
Orson Scott Card, Stefan Rudnicki, et al.
4.6 on Amazon
1 HN comments
YeGoblynQueenneonMay 27, 2021
Here, the author of the article is advertising her book. I see this very often- I'm reading an article on an online publication and the author suddendly and more or less surreptitiously inserts a reference to the latest book they have published and that is currently being sold.
I confess I find this a bit annoying, especially when the subject of the book is unrelated to the subject of the article. I understand that authors must take every opportunity to promote their work, exactly in the same way as everyone else [1].
What I wonder is, is this something that authors are asked to do by agents or publishers? Or is it something an author decides upon him or herself? Is it more common for an author to advertise their recently published books in an article they write, or is it more common not to?
_______________________
Here's my latest published paper:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10994-020-05945-w