HackerNews Readings
40,000 HackerNews book recommendations identified using NLP and deep learning

Scroll down for comments...

The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story

Michael Lewis

4.4 on Amazon

26 HN comments

Blood, Sweat, and Pixels: The Triumphant, Turbulent Stories Behind How Video Games Are Made

Jason Schreier

4.7 on Amazon

26 HN comments

How Google Works

Eric Schmidt and Jonathan Rosenberg

4.5 on Amazon

26 HN comments

Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd Edition (The XP Series)

Kent Beck and Cynthia Andres

4.6 on Amazon

25 HN comments

Clean Architecture: A Craftsman's Guide to Software Structure and Design (Robert C. Martin Series)

Robert Martin

4.7 on Amazon

24 HN comments

The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking

Saifedean Ammous, James Fouhey, et al.

4.7 on Amazon

23 HN comments

Deep Learning with Python

François Chollet

4.5 on Amazon

23 HN comments

The Manager's Path: A Guide for Tech Leaders Navigating Growth and Change

Camille Fournier

4.6 on Amazon

22 HN comments

The Unicorn Project

Gene Kim

4.6 on Amazon

20 HN comments

Information Dashboard Design: Displaying Data for At-a-Glance Monitoring

Stephen Few

4.5 on Amazon

20 HN comments

The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations

Gene Kim , Patrick Debois , et al.

4.6 on Amazon

20 HN comments

Fluent Python: Clear, Concise, and Effective Programming

Luciano Ramalho

4.6 on Amazon

20 HN comments

Excel: Pivot Tables & Charts (Quick Study Computer)

Inc. BarCharts

4.6 on Amazon

20 HN comments

Hacking: The Art of Exploitation, 2nd Edition

Jon Erickson

4.7 on Amazon

19 HN comments

Bitcoin: Hard Money You Can't F*ck With: Why Bitcoin Will Be the Next Global Reserve Currency

Jason A. Williams and Jessica Walker

4.8 on Amazon

19 HN comments

Prev Page 4/16 Next
Sorted by relevance

zwiebackonNov 4, 2019

Excel is the best, maybe the only truly great, piece of software ever written.

gknoyonOct 27, 2013

Thank you for a great writeup! Your examples are excellent, I can see a direct reason why using IPython Notebooks would improve my workflow, AND I am already convinced that pandas could make some of my tasks (e.g. writing Excel reports) easier.

rabboRubbleonJuly 22, 2016

1) Shogun

2) Noble House

3) Excel by Que Publishing

StekoonJuly 1, 2011

Strongly disagree here. Functionality wise, Office (read Excel and Word) murdered everything else in the early-mid 90s.

There are certainly other reasons that contributed greatly to Office's monopoly but I don't see FUD as one of any consequence.

jhaywoodonDec 20, 2013

Fantastic! If only I could write Excel macros in vb.net

B1FF_PSUVMonDec 31, 2016

He wrote the spec for Excel and Gates didn't scream at him, according to his own account: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/06/16/my-first-billg-rev...

(A good read, like most any one of his pieces - nothing wrong with his writing talent, obviously ...)

gnomespaceshiponApr 6, 2018

Fortunately, I don't use Excel at work, but this was a very entertaining read. Thanks @anakic!

Freak_NLonMay 5, 2019

One banana box full of random books: sure. Fun to dig into and see what's there.

Twenty unsorted banana boxes: every book just becomes a blur (as in, “Oh great, another Danielle Steele novel, and another bible, and another Excel 97 for dummies, …”).

safgasCVSonJuly 12, 2019

"just like riding a bike" - best summary of Excel I've read!

pessimizeronSep 26, 2014

Speaking specifically about Excel, the most important thing to learn is the Range object, no matter what book you're using:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff838238%28v=...

Close behind are Collections and UDTs. The best thing to level up after you're comfortable is with 'Implements' for interfaces.

I found that search engines are as good as any book for this stuff. It's smeared all over the internet.

The best place I know of to get a good understanding is http://www.cpearson.com/excel/MainPage.aspx, but it's not a tutorial.

edit: that's what I get for keeping this window open too long:) That's 2 votes for cpearson.com.

rahimnathwanionAug 5, 2014

I much prefer reading Excel spreadsheet with complex formulae, than those with complex macros. It's much easier to follow things around and literally 'see' what's going on.

Parentheses FTW!

jrciionSep 11, 2016

For over 10 years I've written and maintained Excel automation that integrates with a web-based research database. Beyond not being supported by the EULA, Microsoft flat out says in its documentation do not do this COM is not designed for this purpose.

tboyd47onJan 4, 2015

Not necessarily. For apps that don't have rich UIs (i.e. apps that could practically be websites), WebViews can reduce cost by allowing you to use the same HTML for both iOS and Android apps. So I think it's really more of a grey area depending on the situation.

But yeah, I wouldn't want to write Excel in procedural C.

eesmithonMar 3, 2018

No.

Stiff market too. $22 for "Excel 2016 Formulas and Functions" - https://www.amazon.com/Formulas-Functions-Content-Program-Mr...

$15 for "Excel Formulas and Functions For Dummies" - https://www.amazon.com/Excel-Formulas-Functions-Dummies-Blut...

$5 for "Excel Formulas (Quick Study Computer)" - https://www.amazon.com/Excel-Formulas-Quick-Study-Computer/d...

$33 for "Excel 2016 Formulas (Mr. Spreadsheet's Bookshelf)" - https://www.amazon.com/Excel-2016-Formulas-Spreadsheets-Book...

sardonicbryanonNov 13, 2012

Personally, I don't. For one thing, his hard analytical skills (read: Excel hacker) were obviously honed by working in finance. I also feel his background gave him tons of real world, high stakes experience in using Excel to turn data into decisions, which is hard to replicate. Also, I think working a shitty ibanking job with crazy hours can make you both willing to grind and appreciative of how fun being a tech pm can be.

DanBConJune 23, 2020

I think "AutoFill" first appeared in Excel 4 (1992), and was extended in Excel 5.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=imoPAQAAMAAJ&q=excel+4.0...

I've found searching the web for things like "when was the fill handle introduced" or "who invented the fill handle" or "what's the history of the fill handle" gives hopeless results.

scrumperonNov 13, 2012

Not a bad intro at all.

That being said, intros to options scare me in the same way a "Beginner's Guide to Fugu Preparation' would scare me: as a novice, you have no business mucking around with such dangerous things, but as an initiate, you have no need of the article.

Still, there is a readership for such things, and the author is clear to point out the potentially unlimited downside in the intro.

Now, scripting Excel with Python? I'd forgotten about these guys. My interest is officially re-piqued.

jasodeonNov 22, 2017

>making proper applications out of Excel workbooks

Yes, exactly.

If we're being uncharitable, we can spin Greenspun's 10th rule[1] of programming as:

>"Any sufficiently complicated Excel spreadsheet contains an ad-hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of a proper centralized database."

Or, if we're being charitable, we frame it as an internal MVP (Minimum Viable Product):

>"Spreadsheets are the internal 'mvp' that proves the business value before you build the centralized systems. When the spreadsheet becomes unmaintable spaghetti formulas and the xls email workflow crushes under its own weight, that will give the company the evidence and the confidence to spend $1 million and migrate the spreadsheet to a proper centralized database."

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenspun%27s_tenth_rule

anigbrowlonNov 20, 2016

This was way long ago, prior to the existence of web browsers. I suppose I could have just gone to work and read a book but it was literally a hard chair in a broom cupboard and a 'desk' that was barely big enough to hold a monitor and keyboard. There's a limit to how much fun you can have with only a copy of Excel 3.0, especially when I could do the same thing in greater comfort at home.

standupstanduponNov 24, 2017

A lot of people derive enormous comfort and security from the belief that there's a social class who can predict the future. In the past they were shamans and oracles reading goose entrails, nowadays they're analysts and economists reading Excel entrails. In the Foundation trilogy they were psychohistorians, basically economists on steroids.

I think it takes a certain amount of bravery to accept that there are no "experts" when it comes to predicting the future.

Built withby tracyhenry

.

Follow me on